The Flaw in “Repeat Again”

Understanding Tautology in Language

Language is a powerful tool that shapes how we communicate and understand the world. However, it can also be misused, leading to confusion or redundancy. One such example is the phrase “repeat again,” which is often used but technically tautological. This article explores the nuances of this expression and its implications in both formal and informal contexts.

The Redundancy of ‘Repeat Again’

The term “repeat” already carries the meaning of doing something again. Therefore, adding “again” to it becomes unnecessary. For instance, saying “repeat again” is akin to saying “urinate urine,” where the second part of the phrase is redundant because “urinate” already implies the act of expelling waste. While some might argue that “urinate urine” could be interpreted differently in specific contexts, such as when referring to blood, the core idea remains that the phrase is not logically sound.

Here are some examples that highlight the correct usage of “repeat”:

  • Repeat what you said again. (Wrong)
  • Repeat what you said. (Correct)

Similarly, when asking for a repetition, the word “again” is not necessary:

  • Can you repeat what Johnny said once more? (Wrong)
  • Can you repeat what Johnny said? (Correct)

The Complexity of Repeating More Than Once

When an action has already been repeated once and needs to be done again, the use of “again” can become confusing. In such cases, the context usually clarifies the need for multiple repetitions. However, in formal writing, it is best to avoid using “again” altogether:

  • He told me this before but I want him to repeat it again in your presence. (Informal/sub-standard)
  • Please don’t be tired of repeating it again. The students are very stubborn. (Informal/substandard)

These sentences can be rephrased to eliminate the redundancy:

  • He told me this before but I want him to repeat it in your presence.
  • Please don’t be tired of repeating it. The students are very stubborn.

The Use of ‘Again’ with Other Verbs

The issue of redundancy is not limited to “repeat.” Other verbs like “revisit,” “redo,” “restore,” “reintroduce,” and “reconfigure” also face similar challenges when paired with “again.” For example:

  • I am surprised they want to revisit the matter again.
  • You have to redo the assignment again.
  • The government has reintroduced household tax again.
  • He insists you reconfigure the package again.

In each of these cases, the addition of “again” does not contribute any new meaning. Instead, it can be omitted without losing clarity:

  • I am surprised they want to revisit the matter.
  • You have to redo the assignment.
  • The government has reintroduced household tax.
  • He insists you reconfigure the package.

Alternatives to ‘Repeat Again’

If you need to ask for a repetition, there are several alternatives that avoid redundancy:

  • To ask for a first repetition: Could you please say that again? or Can you repeat that?
  • To ask for a third or subsequent repetition: Can you repeat that for the third time? or Could you say that again, please?
  • To emphasize a repeated action: I will repeat it one more time for emphasis or This is the third time I’m saying this.

Other Examples of Tautology

Tautology is not limited to the phrase “repeat again.” Some other common examples include:

  • Free gift
  • Honest truth
  • Evolve over time
  • Past experiences
  • At that moment in time
  • The reason is because
  • The reason why
  • Reverse back
  • Return back
  • Revert back
  • Resume back

These phrases are considered redundant because they use two words to express the same idea.

Conclusion

Understanding the concept of tautology is essential for clear and effective communication. By avoiding redundant phrases like “repeat again,” we can ensure that our language is precise and impactful. Whether in formal writing or everyday conversation, being mindful of our word choices helps us convey our messages more effectively.

Leave a Reply