International Stabilisation Force Proposal for Gaza
The United States is reportedly preparing to introduce a resolution at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) aimed at establishing an International Stabilisation Force (ISF) in Gaza. According to diplomatic sources, this move could happen “within days.” The proposed force would be operational for at least two years, with the possibility of extension until December 2027.
This initiative is tied to President Trump’s 20-point Gaza plan, which outlines broader objectives for ensuring stability in the region following the conflict. However, the draft resolution has already sparked concerns among UN member states due to several ambiguities. One significant point of contention is the absence of a UN mandate for the ISF. Instead, the force would be governed by a newly established “Board of Peace,” raising questions about its legitimacy and oversight.
The primary objective of the ISF, as outlined in the draft, is to disarm Hamas. However, the resolution does not grant the force any authority over Israeli military operations in Gaza. This omission has drawn criticism from various quarters, as it may limit the effectiveness of the proposed force in achieving long-term stability.
Another notable aspect of the draft is the lack of direct reference to Palestinian statehood or self-determination. These elements are mentioned only in passing within Trump’s broader plan, leading to further concerns about the comprehensive approach of the proposal.
Pakistan and Indonesia have both been briefed on the draft resolution, although neither country has taken an official stance. Indonesian officials have expressed their reluctance to contribute troops if the mission is solely focused on disarming Hamas. They have instead called for a proper UN mandate and increased oversight from the UNSC. This sentiment is shared by several Muslim-majority nations, which have urged for revisions to the proposal before any formal vote takes place.
Key Concerns and Reactions
-
Lack of Clarity: The ambiguity surrounding the ISF’s mandate and structure has raised doubts about its ability to achieve its stated goals. The absence of a UN mandate and the creation of a separate governing body, the “Board of Peace,” have been particularly concerning.
-
Limited Authority: The draft resolution does not grant the ISF authority over Israeli military operations, which could undermine its effectiveness in maintaining security and stability in Gaza.
-
Omission of Palestinian Rights: The lack of direct reference to Palestinian statehood and self-determination has been criticized as a significant oversight. These issues are central to the ongoing conflict and must be addressed for any lasting solution.
Calls for Revisions
Several Muslim-majority countries have voiced their concerns and called for amendments to the proposal before it is put to a vote. Their primary demands include a clear UN mandate, greater transparency, and a more inclusive approach that addresses the needs and rights of the Palestinian people.
The situation remains fluid, with the potential for further developments as the US continues to work on finalizing the resolution. The international community will be closely watching how this proposal evolves and how it is received by the UNSC and other key stakeholders.