BNP Leader Accuses Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Sheikh Hasina of Authoritarianism
In a recent speech, Salahuddin Ahmed, a member of the BNP Standing Committee, made strong allegations against two prominent figures in Bangladesh’s political history. He described Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as a ‘self-declared president’ and accused Sheikh Hasina of being a ‘fascist ruler inspired by Baksal ideology’. These remarks were made during a discussion organized by Jatiyatabadi Chhatra Dal in Dhaka, commemorating the November 7 ‘Revolution and Solidarity Day’.
Salahuddin emphasized that this day holds great significance for the nation as it symbolizes the restoration of freedom and democracy. He recalled that after the Liberation War, November 7 became a pivotal moment in the country’s history. When all democratic channels were closed, he claimed, the nation resorted to bloodshed, similar to the July uprising.
Defending his comments, Salahuddin argued that Sheikh Mujib amended the Constitution in just 13 minutes to establish one-party rule under Baksal and declared himself president without an election. “Staying in power without an election is the hallmark of Awami-style democracy,” he said. He further alleged that from Sheikh Mujib to Sheikh Hasina, this has been their approach, suggesting that democracy is absent from their ideology.
Citing historical documents compiled by poet Hasan Hafizur Rahman in 1983, Salahuddin claimed that the declaration of independence was actually made by Ziaur Rahman, not Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. He stated, “On March 26, Ziaur Rahman announced the country’s independence from Chittagong’s Sholoshahar area as the provisional chief of state.”
Referring to writings by members of Tajuddin Ahmad’s family, Salahuddin added, “Tajuddin went to Mujib that night with a tape recorder, but Sheikh Mujib refused to give any declaration. Yet, the April 10 proclamation states Mujib had ‘formally declared’ independence – how is that possible?” He concluded that the Awami League’s manipulation of the declaration issue reveals a political foundation built on lies.
Despite these criticisms, Salahuddin acknowledged Sheikh Mujibur Rahman as a national leader and credited his role during the Liberation War. However, he stressed that his post-independence actions must also be part of the conversation. “The nation expected freedom, rights, and democracy from Sheikh Mujib, but he buried democracy with his own hands. Sheikh Hasina has done the same,” he said.
Concerns Over Political Actions Threatening People’s Rights
Salahuddin also raised concerns about the potential dangers posed by some political parties to people’s rights. He highlighted the authoritarian tendencies of the ruling party, claiming that Sheikh Hasina has imposed fascism under the guise of democracy.
He criticized the Awami League’s November 13 ‘lockdown’ program, stating that BNP will resist it. “Awami League has lost its sanity. If people really supported their calls, why were they driven out of the country on August 5 last year?” he questioned.
Salahuddin claimed that the lockdown was centered around the verdict in a case involving Sheikh Hasina. “If you have courage, come back to the country and face trial in court,” he challenged the ruling party.
The Ongoing Political Tensions
The political landscape in Bangladesh remains tense, with ongoing debates about the legitimacy of past and present leaders. Salahuddin’s comments reflect the deep divisions within the country’s political spectrum. His accusations against Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Sheikh Hasina highlight the complex narratives surrounding Bangladesh’s history and governance.
As the nation continues to grapple with these issues, the call for transparency and accountability remains a central theme in public discourse. The debate over who truly led the country to independence and how power has been wielded since then is far from settled.