Court withholds verdict in EFCC, AGF’s appeal against Aiteo boss

Legal Battle Over Property Ownership and Alleged Fraud

The Court of Appeal in Abuja has reserved its judgment on an appeal filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF). The appeal aims to overturn a High Court decision that halted the prosecution of Benedict Peters, the CEO and founder of the Aiteo Group. Other parties involved in the appeal include the British National Crime Agency (NCA) and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), while the respondents are Benedict Peters, Colinwood Ltd, and Rosewood Investment.

The case, numbered CA/CV/71/2022, was presided over by a panel of judges including Justice Oye Oyewumi and Justice Okon Abang. The court has set a date for its judgment, which will be communicated to all parties once the arguments from both sides have been presented.

The appeal challenges the ruling of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), which dismissed all allegations of corruption, bribery, and money laundering against Peters. These allegations were brought by British and Nigerian agencies related to his ownership of several properties.

Key Evidence and Legal Arguments

During the trial, the judge, Justice Olukayode Adeniyi, found that the EFCC based its case on an undated and unsigned document titled “Highly Confidential Attorney Work.” This document allegedly came from Donald Chidi Amangbo but did not bear the name of its author. Based on this evidence, the court awarded N200 million in damages against the EFCC, the then AGF, Abubakar Malami, SAN, and five others, in favor of Peters and three companies.

The court declared that the defendants had engaged in fraudulent behavior by suppressing and misrepresenting facts. It stated that they falsely claimed that the properties owned by the claimants belonged to Mrs. Deziani Alison Madueke, a former Nigerian Minister of Petroleum, or were unlawfully acquired. The court ruled that these claims were false and baseless, constituting the tort of carousel fraud.

Background of the Case

The suit, marked FCT/HC/CV/0536/17, was filed on May 11, 2017, by a team of lawyers representing the plaintiffs, including Prof Mike Ozekhome, SAN, Chief Emeka Ozoani, SAN, and others. An amended statement of claim was submitted on January 31, 2019. Suleiman Jibrin represented the EFCC and six other parties, while Farouk Abdullah led the legal team for the AGF.

The trial court condemned the “deceitful sham allegations” made by the defendants. It held that the unlawful conspiracy of the defendants was to extract assets, properties, and monies through intimidation and coercion, which the claimants were legitimately entitled to.

Claims and Damages

In the lawsuit, the claimants sought $5 billion USD (equivalent to N1.5 trillion at the time exchange rate of 315 to one US Dollar) for the tort of carousel fraud. The court criticized the defendants for fraudulently misrepresenting facts in their claims that the properties belonging to the plaintiffs were owned by Mrs. Deziani Alison Madueke and were therefore unlawfully acquired.

The properties in question, which were falsely attributed to Mrs. Madueke, include:

  • 270-17 Street, Unit #4204, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Flat 5 Parkview, 83-86 Prince Albert Road, St. John’s Wood, London
  • Flat 58 Harley House Marylebone, London
  • Apartments 4 & 5, Arlington Road, London

Ongoing Legal Implications

This case highlights the complexities of cross-border legal disputes involving property ownership, fraud, and international law enforcement cooperation. The outcome of the appeal could have significant implications for future cases involving similar allegations.

As the Court of Appeal prepares to deliver its judgment, all eyes are on the legal proceedings that may redefine the boundaries of anti-corruption efforts and property rights in Nigeria.

Leave a Reply